Kemi Badenoch, a well-known political figure, recently made remarks about mammograms that have sparked significant discussion. She described the process as “very intrusive,” stating, “I’ve had a mammogram, it is a very, very intrusive process… it involves the clinician holding both of your breasts, for a long period of time, feeling them, manipulating them, putting them in the machine. I would not want a man doing that.” These comments have raised concerns about equality and the perceived value of trained male radiographers, especially amidst a growing list of women awaiting mammograms.

There is currently a notable shortage of radiographers, with the Society of Radiographers suggesting that male technicians should also be permitted to perform mammograms.

Mammograms play a crucial role in detecting breast cancer. Women over the age of 50 are urged to have regular screenings to check for any abnormalities. Although the procedure can be uncomfortable, it is essential for early detection and potentially life-saving.

Experiences with mammograms vary; for some, the process can feel like a tug-of-war, particularly for those with smaller breasts. Regardless, the technicians, whether male or female, are trained to handle the examination with care.

Having undergone regular mammograms for six years, I know the importance of these screenings firsthand, as mine led to an early breast cancer diagnosis. While all my mammograms were conducted by female radiographers, I wonder whether I would have felt differently had a male performed the procedure—and the thought saddens me.

The anxiety regarding male medical professionals’ interactions with women’s bodies became apparent to me in 2018 during an MRI scan. A male technician unexpectedly left the room when I was preparing for the procedure, suggesting a discomfort that seemed out of place. My intent was to convey that mutual trust existed—we were there to address health concerns together, regardless of gender.

In healthcare, individuals trust professionals of all backgrounds and genders, from support staff to specialists. My trust in healthcare has not wavered based on the sex of my medical providers, including my cancer doctor and male specialists who have performed other procedures on me.

While admitting discomfort in this discussion, I find myself aligning with Badenoch’s stance. During a time when the health system is strained, her comments reflect a concern for maintaining dignity during sensitive procedures. The Society of Radiographers has proposed allowing male technicians to alleviate staffing issues, but many feel offering women the choice of a female technician is paramount.

Routine screenings are vital, and while the NHS recommends them for women aged 50 to 71 every three years, participation rates have been troublingly low. Campaigns are ongoing to encourage women to attend screenings, but introducing male radiographers may not necessarily improve attendance rates.

Studies indicate that women’s discomfort during intimate examinations is often underestimated by male medical professionals. Personal stories reveal instances where women felt unease or inadequately heard regarding their pain during procedures, underscoring the importance of maintaining sensitivity in these contexts.

While many male medical professionals excel in their fields, the delicate nature of women’s health care requires acknowledgment of their unique vulnerabilities. An already challenging situation shouldn’t be compounded by added discomfort when care is needed most.